I'm sitting here actually trying to link "Portrait of My Body" and "Why We Crave Horror Movies." Sober. I think I've got it, but it all seems a bit too strange for a blog, or for sharing, or for thinking even. I wonder if several of us were pulled in easily to "Portrait" simply because we wanted to connect to it somehow, have the scars made beautiful or the imperfections justifiable. What a jolt those of us must have had when it all went wrong halfway in and our tender author betrayed us, made it a bit uncomfortable, and stank up the room. I wondered the same thing halfway through King's piece. It was all fine and good until he started saying things like "we" and "madman," and sheesh, so close together like that?
Which brings me to another bit of a loser supposition: what if certain folks are right? What if there is no "true" us, only the performer on paper? What if we cannot escape him/her simply because we (the reader) are the intended audience for us (the writer) and, here's the kicker, we know what we cannot bear to hear? Then, riddle me this Batman, is there any point at all to this academic, masturbatory, narcissistic exercise called writing?
Come on. You didn't think I was that innocent, did you?
Let's try something here. Portrait # One:
Long fingers. Granma loved them, called them piano chasers. (And they were, years ago, chasers along porcelain sound). Here, a sliver of a scar in the shape of the glass that sliced it, either side of my middle right knuckle. Hands just beginning to crepe up a bit after years of washing dishes, cleaning houses, working dirt. They held babies and stroked hair and clasped others and enunciated sentences. Married by joints that ache when it's going to rain and sometimes just because. They were the prettiest thing I had and are now the most belligerent sign of my wisdom. The left one bears a wedding ring so heavy that it has left a permanent, soft dent. I find comfort in them, the bones and the thinning skin that are the closet thing to my writing, my history, my life. My hands.
Sookay. Now. Portrait # Two:
Cuticles long scarred by permanent teeth, ripped and bit and torn until they bled. I curl the tips under to hide the flesh when I pay in cash, cut the nails to cripple their chances of self-mutilation. Veiny and branded by a drop of velvety hot grease -- a moment of self-defense against someone I loved. Fingers so long that they will have no choice but to become claws in the next two decades, bony things that held cigarettes and formed obscene gestures and slapped a friend once in a drunken rage. I am terrified of these appendages for they just might one day turn on the rest of me in jointy glee. Premeditated. Justifiable handocide. My hands.
Saalright. Pick one. Which portrait is true? Why, both, of course. And neither. Somewhere in the middle. Whatever I choose to remember or believe or tell. I think that may be the point, after all: to tell the truth, but to tell it slant (English majors, unite). Tell it ugly, sometimes, otherwise the writer in you will call bullshit on the whole sweet thing.
And for reasons beyond my own understanding this morning, the following verse just came into my head:
Would you believe in a love at first sight? Yes, I'm certain that it happens all the time. What do you see when you turn out the light? I can't tell you, but I know it's mine.
KPD